Ten days away with two children under eight. Which shape for the trip?

Option A is the better shape because a ten-day trip with two children under eight is less about maximizing sights and more about minimizing stress and preserving flexibility. Staying in one base removes repeated packing, transfers, and check-ins, which are among the most tiring and error-prone parts of family travel, and it supports familiar routines such as naps, early bedtimes, and consistent sleeping arrangements. Short daily outings plus afternoon pool time match young children's limited stamina and attention spans and leave room for downtime, bad nights, illness, or meltdowns without derailing the whole trip. By contrast, Option B's three stops every three days would create frequent relocation days and long transit segments with tired children, with little recovery time. Its reliance on pre-booked big sights can make the itinerary rigid, turning prepaid obligations into pressure if children need a slower pace. Option B may appeal for a sightseeing-focused adult trip, but for this family configuration Option A is lower-risk, more enjoyable, and more realistically child-paced.